standards

Confusion Over NFPA Regs About UL-Recognized Cable


Here's a topical press release we just received from Northwire. Can you relate?

Cable Fables

Confusion and Misconceptions about NFPA-79

 read more »

From 'Machine Builder Forum: Heard On Discrete'

The IEC 61131 Non-standard


I have written about IEC for 4 issues. I would like to share a thread from the Automation Control List as an exclamation point to my columns!!

The user is programming in Step 7 (Siemens) . The names have been removed. Be sure to read the very last line. I have always said that IEC 61131 is a great concept, but I don't try to sell it as a silver bullet for automation programming.

I am trying to export a POU but Export function is grayed out. I have tried to right-click on my MAIN (%OB1) block and select Export, but it is grayed out and I cannot figure out what i am doing wrong. I am trying to do this in IEC-1131 mode. Thanks!
Reply to this post...

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IMPORT and EXPORT only work in SIMATIC Mode, Why do you want to use it?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I was hoping to port the logic over to another IEC program editor and reuse the code. It would be a lot easier than retyping the code from scratch.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

You can export the logic over as a text file in stl code and then maybe you can import that into your other application.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IEC is a standard, but it's not that standard. :(
The export only exports in a proprietary format anyway.

From 'Machine Builder Forum: Heard On Discrete'

Safety Standards: What Are We Paying For?


Recently I replaced an old extrusion press controller system with a new PLC. Being a good engineer, I had the customer contact the local city engineering department. The inspector said that since this machine never stood a chance of being UL certified, it would need to be certified by an independent compliance company. The inspector found few discrepancies, but his report frequently referred to UL508 and UL508A as the authority for items that needed to be fixed.

 read more »

From 'Machine Builder Forum: Heard On Discrete'